Riportiamo un brano (epurato, secondo lo Statuto della nostra associazione, da ogni riferimento politico) tratto da un'interessante lettera del ministro LUCA ZAIA* al "Corriere del Veneto" in cui si difende la proposta di inserire la lingua veneta tra quelle insegnate in quei territori in cui questa รจ stata storicamente impiegata.
A tutti quelli che pensano alla lingua come a un mondo morto, mai in evoluzione, custodito dalle accademie e dalle corti, vale worth remembering that it was Umberto Eco, not a dangerous subversive League, stating that as of Italy was Cavour, but the Italian was to make Mike Bongiorno. That said, those that have always brought up to the double truth (there's one for them and for the people) I confirm my thoughts.
(...) The Venetian is not a dialect, but a national language. It is a question of vocabulary that relates to maternal history of a community that lives on land. This is an asset, not a deprivation. A rich social cross because it belongs to the rich as the poor. The same can not be said for that language meta planning (and a little 'meta) which is the Italian school, for which Fausto Pezzato defense melts. It's a matter of logic: no one wants to separate from the rest of the Veneto Peninsula using language as a pick. Rather, it is true that some of the nation has tried to ghettoise Veneto censoring their language and ridiculing through powerful systems of mass communication, teachers and the territory they had nothing to do and school programs as keys statist ideology. To claim the right to use their native language is not holed up in the fort, but feel at one with its own values. (...)
* Minister of Agriculture, Food and Forestry
May 22, 2009
0 comments:
Post a Comment